I know I've mentioned Charles
Poliquin quite a few times in my blogs, website, and videos. That's because he's the best in my industry. I've been studying everything I could get my hands on since high school, which is roughly 18 years now. I continue to invest in my education by attending seminars, by books, and reading / learning everything that other great strength coaches are doing and that work. There are many great coaches out there that I study, but
Poliquin blows everyone away in my book.
Something that's been happening in my industry for awhile now is this "functional training" movement. I usually refer to it as "circus training" because it's a joke. People are so adamant on being creative that they forget about results. Just like throwing out the baby with the bath water.
Here's a quick article that
Poliquin just wrote on the subject.
by Charles Poliquin
I believe that if a strength coach is serious about becoming the best they can be in their profession, they have to make reading a regular habit. Whether it is through books, magazines or websites, the education of a strength coach does not end after a certification or college degree is earned. Much of the material I read comes from studies in peer-reviewed journals, which by their nature can be rather dry. But learning does not necessarily have to be boring.
The Internet is a great way to not only acquire information but also share a laugh. Because I have
PICP coaches in 40 countries, I get a lot of e-mails from all corners of the globe. Many of these include links to video clips that are informative and, in many cases, hilarious. What I'd like to do is share with you, through the phenomenon of
YouTube.com, real-life examples that dispel three common myths about training.
Myth 1: Functional training is far better than classical strength training.
"Functional training," the latest buzzword in strength coaching, is gradually moving ahead of the nationwide obsession with core training. Its origins can be traced to rehabilitation, and it involves performing exercises that transfer best to returning to daily activity or athletic performance. Often, much of this type of training is based upon specialized cable exercises, medicine balls, and balance movements on rocker boards.
Asian martial arts masters were reputed to have gotten their ideas from studying animal fighting, hence names for techniques like "Tiger Claw" and "Donkey Kick." I have a theory that "functional trainers" also tried to use the same concepts by spending time at the zoo to develop their system. Look at their calves - they look like they got their loading parameter concepts from studying the legs of parrots!
Perhaps they have an issue with building muscle mass or getting strong? Anyway, here is a link to a video showing one type of silly functional exercise to develop "explosive power" (as opposed to nonexplosive power?) in the upper body:
Besides promoting bizarre exercises such as that one, see what some misguided trainers have done to a great Olympic lifting exercise such as the clean:
Is this supposed to be the type of training that will enable athletes to fulfill their physical potential? What is wrong with simply performing the exercise with a barbell as it has been done for the past century?
The collective mantra of functional trainers is "train movements, not muscles." When someone asks me if I believe that functional training will replace classical strength training, I reply, "Functional training is like
Capoiera, and classical strength training is like boxing." Check out this video, which dramatically illustrates this concept:
Misconception #2: Single-joint movements are useless for athletes.
Last March I spoke at a great conference in Colorado hosted by
PTontheNET.com called "Meeting of the Minds." It involved many leaders in the industry, each talking for 20 minutes about their practices and how they could help owners of gym chains who were in attendance.
One speaker, sporting
linguini arms, told the audience that isolation exercises and even some compound movements (such as the bench press) were basically evil. He suggested that we should forget about barbells and dumbbells and use the nylon contraption he sold. This device supposedly was the training secret of the Navy Seals. I heard the same type of crap from an Aussie physiotherapist at
FitPro 2008 who said that athletes don't need to perform exercises such as curls.
Or in the case of a more famous individual, perhaps soccer superstar Michael Owen might have avoided injury with some Petersen step-ups. Check this out:
Any serious strength coach knows that weakness in a single muscle can limit performance - which is why I spend so much time in my
PICP courses talking about structural balance. When I was introduced to
powerlifting guru Louie Simmons through US hammer throw champion Jud Logan, we rapidly found out that we both espoused the structural-balance concept in developing maximal strength.
Misconception 3: Chains work for every exercise.
Thanks to innovative individuals such as Louie Simmons and Nautilus founder Arthur Jones, chains have become a valuable way to accommodate what is called an ascending strength curve.
When an exercise is said to have an ascending strength curve, the exercise becomes easier towards the end range of the movements; you'll find such varying torque capabilities in squats, presses and
deadlifts. When an exercise is said to have a descending strength curve, the exercise becomes harder during the end of the movement; you'll find descending strength curves in such exercises as chin-ups, rows and leg curls.
Unfortunately, the concept of using chains to accomplish an ascending strength curve is now being applied in every single exercise by dorks who don't understand their application at all. In the following video, you'll see a guy applying them to what may as well be termed the "
Borat curl" or the "
Kazahkstan good morning."
By the way, it is rumored that this individual was listening to Barry
Manilow's "Copacabana" on his headset to acquire that glaring intensity.
Now I feel better: I've gotten some of my pet peeves about the industry off my chest. And I must mention that my partners in crime for these videos are South African bodybuilding champ Nicole
Acker, equipment salesman extraordinaire Jim Fischer and
PICP coach Antonio
Gummels.